Steve Jobs and Apple have dragged the music industry
into the 21st century — screaming and kicking.
It ha been amazing to see how record company executives
have completely failed to see the potential of online
music downloads.
Think about it: Here is a technology that potentially
lets you sell your whole back catalogue without all
the costs connected with packaging, transport and
distribution. Sure, you need some heavy Internet servers,
but still, compared to printing CD covers and packing
jewel cases, this is peanuts.
But no, the record companies still believe that our
ability to rip MP3 or AAC files for our friends will
make record sales drop.
Question: Did our ability to make our own music cassette
compilations stop us from buying records?
We all know the result of this way of thinking: Users
starts using all kinds of peer to peer networks, downloading
music files without paying for them.
The Apple iTunes Music Store, a revolution!
Because of this the importance of the Apple iTunes
Music Store can’t be overrated.
Jobs & Co have proved once and for all that the
future of the music industry lays online. You can
sell music files with a great profit. Yes, downloading
may eventually replace the CD, but the record companies
will not loose in the process.
But is the iTunes Music Store any good? We have two
iPods at home, and no less than three Macs, and we
have used the iTunes program quite extensively.
It works very well indeed. You click on the Music
Store icon, and enter your search term in the upper
right hand corner. If iTunes have the tune or artist
it will be listed.
You then click on the download button for the song
or album your looking for, enter your account password
and the music is automatically downloaded to your
iTunes library.
We have some 300 “Apple songs” in our
collection.
The weakness of the Apple Music Store
However, the Apple Music store has two major disadvantages.
First, the songs you buy are coded in a proprietary
file format. It is based on the open AAC format (in
essence “MP4? files/MPEG4). However,
Apple’s FairPlay Digital rights management (DRM)
limits the number of CD burns of playlists, and the
number of computers that can play the files.
This is obviously an attempt to placate the record
industry, but may also be an attempt to stop the distribution
of too many copies of iTunes Music Store files —
i.e. Apple is starting to think like the record companies.
In any case, it is a nuisance, as it limits your
ability to burn CD copies and compilations.
Secondly, the sound quality is not optimal. It is
good enough for regular iPod ear-buds, but as soon
as you start playing these files through high quality
ear phones or a proper stereo, the sound is flat.
While you may select a higher quality when ripping
your own CDs in iTunes (e.g. 192 kbps AAC), you can’t
select a higher bit rate in the Music Store.
The ideal online music store
Obviously our ideal music store would give us the
same advantages as buying a regular CD and ripping
it in iTunes (or any other music file program): The
files should not be copy protected and we should be
able to select file variants with a better sound quality.
The alternatives of the music industry is not good
enough in this respect. As the Wikipedia puts it:
Universal Music Group and Sony teamed up with a service
called Duet, later renamed PressPlay [now integrated
in the new Napster]. EMI, AOL/Time Warner and BMG
teamed up with MusicNet [now a service that deliver
files to other music store, like Y!Music]. Again,
both services struggled, hampered by high prices and
heavy limitations on how downloaded files could be
used once paid for. In the end, consumers chose instead
to flock to the free file sharing programs, which
were far more convenient to use and free to boot.
The Yahoo Music Store has a complicated system of
copy rules and payments, and the files cannot be played
on an iPod. That one is clearly not an option!
The Russians to the rescue?
When complaining about all this hassle to one of
our friends, he pointed us to the AllofMP3.com site.
We took a look and was immediately impressed.
Yes, here is a site that let’s us decide on
the sampling rate (i.e. sound quality of files). We
can also select which format to download: MP3 , AAC,
Ogg Vorbis, FLAC and Musepack.
And yes, there is no copyright protection. When the
file has been downloaded, we decide what we do with
it, as we would have with a file ripped from one of
our own CDs.
The web store interface is easy to read, the search
engine is good, and there is enough information on
the various tracks to make a record buyer happy. There
is even a Amazon-like “if you like this song,
you might also want to listen to these artist”
kind of feature.
The downloading of files is a bit cumbersome on a
Mac, as you have to download every single track of
an album separately. PC users may, however, make use
of the “allTunes” Windows software, which
makes this process painless.
(Yeah, we noticed the similarity with the
iTunes name as well.)
Add to this some very friendly pricing (AllofMP3
charges for the volume of data downloaded, not for
individual songs — all in all some 1 cent per
MB), and it seems we are looking at a winner.
Too good to be true?
Hm. We wondered… Isn’t this too good
to be true? How on earth can AllofMP3 present the
latest albums by Shakira, the Pet Shop Boys or Coldplay
in this manner, when the record companies hate these
kind of services?
The record companies managed to close down the first
edition of Napster and fought Steve Jobs and Apple
all the way. Why on earth should they tolerate an
iTunes killer of this sort?
Or to put it more bluntly: Is AllofMP3 legal?
This is where it gets tricky, and the reader (and
any record company representatives subscribing to
our newsletter) should note that we are not legal
experts, nor do we know much about international intellectual
property law.
It turns out that AllofMP3 has an agreement with
the Russian Copyright Society in the same way as Russian
radio stations have. AllofMP3 therefore claims that
the service is legal — at least in Russia.
This hasn’t stopped the International Federation
of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) from trying to
close it down.
Whether it is legal outside Russia is probably depending
on local laws and regulations. Vadim Medvedev of AllofMP3
says to Museeker that:
“We are aware of the fact that uploading tracks
may be illegal according to the laws in the country
of the customer. That is entirely his own responsibility.
Allofmp3 is allowed to use these tracks for our service
according to Russian legislation as long as we pay
the copyrights to ROMS.”
The Wikipedia has a detailed presentation of the
arguments raised for the US. We get dizzy just trying
to read those paragraphs. This legal ambiguity is
why we cannot recommend AllofMP3 as an alternative
too iTunes at the moment.
AllofMP3 weaknesses
Is the AllofMP3.com site a product of the Russian
Mafia, another attempt at white-washing drug money?
We have no reason to believe so, but from an international
intellectual property law perspective this is definitely
a borderline activity.
According to the Wikiepedia there have been a few
unverifiable reports of some users having their credit
cards used fraudulently after using the allofmp3.com
service. However, many users have paid AllofMP3 a
lot by credit card directly and reported no suspicious
activity. Our friend has had no problems.
We have heard of technical glitches, but users have
apparently got their money refunded to their AllofMP3
accounts when facing download problems.
The site may also be a little slow, as it often codes
your files after you have ordered them. The site is
clearly popular, and is regularly “down for
maintenance”. In spite of this, however, our
friend is very happy with the service, and the last
time we discussed this with him he was not loosing
sleep over legalities.
(You do not believe that this friend exists, do you
He certainly does, and is heavily into 1970’s
disco and Indian Bollywood music…)
A model for the music industry
AllofMP3s pricing is ridiculously low, and the artists
and the record companies do in no way get back what
they deserve for their efforts in our opinion.
Apple has proven that people are willing to pay a
dollar, a pound or a euro to download a song. We would
be willing to pay more to get files of the quality
AllofMP3 is offering.
In other words: If the record industry could get
beyond their fear of illegal copying (this is a battle
you cannot win, guys!) an international service following
the lead of AllofMP3 could become a great success,
and would probably bring in a lot of money. For the
time being their attitude is producing Russian millionaires.
Free MP3 file from Pandia
Given that you have read through the whole article,
we think you deserve a reward.
Click on the link below to download a brand new MP3
file by the Norwegian pop/electronica project Sandstone.
And yes, it is definitely legal, as we own the copyright.
Listen to Sandstone: The City that Never
Was (Free MP3 file, 3 MB, right click to download)
See also:
Russian police probe cheap downloads site (The Register)
Online music stores (Wikipedia)
Barely Legal — The hottest trend in file sharing.
(The Slate)
AllOfMP3 Launches allTunes (TechCrunch)
AllofMP3.com (review by TechGuide)
Museekster AllofMP3 FAQ
Interview with Vadim Medvedev, content manager of
Allofmp3 (Museekster)